Above:
Bel Powley and Kristen Wiig star in Ms. Heller’s new movie. Photo ©Sony Pictures Classics
In the most memorable scene of
Marielle Heller’s 1970s-set film “The Diary of a Teenage Girl,” the film’s
sixteen-year-old heroine, Minnie (Bel Powley), drops acid. She does it right after having sex with her
mother’s boyfriend, Monroe (Alexander Skarsgård), who seems pitiful indeed compared
to Minnie’s sudden vision—her small feet rising a few inches from the bed as
her arms sprout glittering, phoenix-like wings.
That image is confident, exultant—Minnie is basking in the
glow of her ascendant desires. Yet there
is something childish and cartoon-like about her imagined feathery
appendages. Throughout the movie, Minnie
tackles trials that would traumatize adults (betrayal, drug use, rape). But she is still, as the title reminds us, a
girl, and her “lover” happens to be a grown man and a child molester.
With a dopey grin and a cheesecake mustache, Monroe looks
less like a lothario than a dull-witted, slimy slug. He sleeps with Minnie countless times, and
she convinces herself that she loves him. “Don’t you feel like you’re being taken
advantage of?” Minnie’s friend Kimmie (Madeleine Waters) asks her over the
phone. Minnie’s only response is injured
silence.
Watching “The Diary of a Teenage Girl” is not a pleasant
experience. Every time Monroe exploits
Minnie, she’s pushed deeper into emotional turmoil; late in the film, she even
finds herself wandering through the streets of San Francisco, perched on the
precipice of homelessness. Like so many
American independent films, this one (which is based on a graphic novel by
Phoebe Gloeckner) instinctively zeroes in on myriad bleak outcomes before
winging its way toward optimism.
Throughout the film, detailed cartoons of Minnie’s erotic
fantasies rove, float, and dance across the screen. Yet in the end, “The Diary of a Teenage Girl”
takes an almost puritanical view of sex.
Predators like Monroe may haunt the streets and headlines of America,
but the movie uses him not as a character, but as a crutch designed to appease
viewers who might be aghast at a film that portrayed sex as something other
than deviance.
In other words, moviegoers probably would have been more
shocked if the story had focused on an unexploited, well-adjusted teenage girl
discovering her sexuality. So while Minnie’s
late revelation that she doesn’t need male companionship to be happy (“Maybe no
one will ever love me,” she declares with an air of confident acceptance) is
heartening, it carries a whiff of the monastic because the film is so
determined to associate sex with sickos like Monroe.
No comments:
Post a Comment