Last year, Jaden Smith (son of
Will and Jada Pinkett) went to a screening of Christopher Nolan’s sci-fi
blockbuster “Interstellar.” Except he
didn’t just go—he arrived dressed in
a spacesuit (presumably an homage to the movie’s heroic astronauts). And then, in the midst of the film, he cried
out a tribute to its venerated director: “That’s my man, Nolan!”
Thank you, Jaden.
If there was ever an action to symbolize what we, the Nolan geeks of the
world feel for our hero, it was that.
Not that I need the competition; far from it. I may not own a spacesuit, but I did go to
the Hollywood Theater’s advance screening of “Interstellar” dressed in my own
uniform—a light blue dress shirt and black slacks, my tribute to the ensemble
worn by Mr. Nolan ever since his early days as a filmmaker.
In an era where superheroes bask in near-religious
worship and no one forgets their first “Doctor Who” doctor, I don’t feel self
conscious owning up to my geekiness. But
that doesn’t answer the question—why?
Why do Christopher Nolan and his movies inspire such passion? Is it because he’s a great filmmaker? (He is.)
Is it because he’s an appealing celebrity? (He’s that too.) Or is it some combination of the two, some
maelstrom of inspiration and fanaticism that we’ve all been captured by?
My answer is none of the above. Because the true reason why Christopher Nolan
is subject to so much ardor speaks to what we crave as moviegoers—a certain
kind of movie. And it’s a kind of movie
that I, with a keyboard in lieu of a rocket ship, will now explore.
In the late 1900s, Mr. Nolan made his directorial debut
with “Following,” a stark, sleek, black and white thriller. It was about a dopey writer named Bill
(Jeremy Theobald) taken under the wing of a dashing burglar (Alex Haw). The result of their sinister meet cute? A string of break-ins and philosophical
conversations about the nature of intrusion and violation.
At first sight, “Following,” with its wordy screenplay
and nastily ambiguous ending, must have seemed like strictly art house
art. But cast Mr. Nolan’s cinematic
debut in the shadow of his box office-busting “Dark Knight” trilogy and you can
see that he was always a blockbuster entertainer at his core. After all, “Following” was the story of a young
man struggling to swim above the waves of his failings, trying to instill some
meaning in his life; what is that if not the narrative of all great blockbusters,
from “Star Wars” (the story of Luke Skywalker coming of age) to “Spider-Man” (the
story of Peter Parker striving to uphold his superheroic responsibilities)?
In
other words, for all of those movies, proving your manhood (or failing to prove
it) meant facing some sort of physical and emotional struggle. Yet the struggles in Mr. Nolan’s multiplex
epics are particularly potent. Remember
that moment in “Inception” when Dom Cobb (Leonardo DiCaprio) tried to wrench
himself out from between two concrete walls? While corporate thugs loaded their guns behind
him? The scene was smoothly
adrenaline-charged, not only because of the threat of death, but because on a
grand scale, it symbolized Cobb’s desperation to be free, to return to the family
he’d been forced to abandon.
In
that vein, “Interstellar” is also a struggling-hero movie—except this time, the
quest becomes entangled with the survival of our planet. The movie starts in a future where food has
dried up along with human ambition (“You don’t believe we went to the moon?”
one character poignantly asks a dogmatic teacher). Yet at a hidden location, the remnants of
NASA are struggling to embark on a mission to new planets—planets that could be
home to humans after Earth has wheezed its last store of supplies.
You
have to love Mr. Nolan’s flair for drama.
He would never just have NASA send some astronauts into the unknown; he
had to have them go in defiance of a depressed, disbelieving society. Hope against hope, hope in the face of
failure, hope in spite of everything lost—that is the credo of his movie.
That
hope enhances the power of the story’s struggle. The film’s hero is Cooper (Matthew
McConaughey), the pilot of a pin-wheeling spaceship called the Endurance. Aided by his compatriots (played by Anne
Hathaway, David Gyasi, and Bill Irwin), Cooper steers the Endurance through a dizzying wormhole and down to two different
cold, wet planets. And each time, yet
again, there is a struggle, whether it’s against a mountainous wave, the pull
of gravity, or even time (which, due to relativity, passes faster on Earth than
it does for our heroes, making their mission all the more desperate).
Still,
“Interstellar” is not just an outer space adventure—it is a sadness-soaked
movie, more disturbing even than Mr. Nolan’s “The Dark Knight Rises” (which was
rife with beatings and neck-breakings).
I figured that out early on when Cooper has to say goodbye to his
daughter Murph (MacKenzie Foy) before beginning his mission. “I’m coming back!” Cooper insists, before
climbing into his truck and driving into the dusty distance. He doesn’t see Murph running, trying to catch
up to him, crying out, even as she’s drowned out by Hans Zimmer’s score, as it sears
your ears painfully.
Unbearable. Yet I now realize that that moment is
perfect. The struggle of “Interstellar” only
matters because of the anguish. Because
why would it be important for Cooper to return home if he didn’t have to make
amends, if he didn’t have to be sure that the last time he saw his daughter
wasn’t when she was in her room, sobbing?
After all, to quote James Cameron, “The greatest of loves can only be
measured against the greatest of adversities, and the greatest sacrifices thus
defined.”
“Interstellar”
is a brisk, smoothly constructed movie (it’s almost three hours long; it feels
like it’s half that). Yet it’s still
hard to make it through all of its outpourings of grief and rage. And that’s why Mr. Nolan’s creation is so
wonderful—it tests you. “Don’t recoil
from the ferocity of this occasion—rise to it,” the movie seems to say, and
it’s unbelievably satisfying to do just that.
For
me, there weren’t a lot of other movies in 2014 that beckoned so forcefully. Yes, I was enraptured by the tender sibling
drama in “The Skeleton Twins,” the call-to-action in “Selma,” and the ferocious
satire in Richard Ayoade’s “The Double” (which plugged into the zeitgeist of
corporate politics, technological omnipotence, and twenty-first century
morality). But aside from those films,
“Interstellar” was the only movie of 2014 that really, genuinely moved me.
And
that’s fine. In an era where we have over
a century of movies to pour over, a year where you only connect with a handful of
new ones isn’t such a terrible thing. And
besides, the thrill of seeing my faith in Mr. Nolan reaffirmed this past year was
all-conquering. Jaden Smith may have
said it first but, at least to those of us who care about Mr. Nolan’s movies,
he’s our man.
But I
don’t want to get too wrapped up in a Nolan career retrospective. Because even if it weren’t enmeshed in the
tapestry of its creator’s oeuvre, “Interstellar” would be beautiful. It’s the way the emotions hit you—especially
in the final scene, when a now hundred-something Murph (Ellen Burstyn) is
visited by her father who, caught in the spell of slow time, is still the same
age as Matthew McConaughey.
It
begins as Cooper enters a hospital room.
A crowd of people surrounds a bed, hiding it from view and once again,
Mr. Zimmer’s music surges forth. But
this time, it’s a hopeful crescendo, one that rises and breaks off as Cooper
approaches the bed. And then, the music quiets
as a smiling Murph reaches for him.
The
following conversation is odd. Father
and daughter exchange a joke; reflect on all they’ve experienced; and prepare
to say goodbye for the last time, as Murph asks her father to take on yet
another adventure. But there’s one
moment in that scene that I love the most, the sweetest moment of
“Interstellar,” one of the sweetest moments of any film. Murph tells Cooper that many people didn’t
think he was coming back, but that she knew that he would. And the reason she gives made me feel sad,
alive, sad, happy, alive:
“Because
my dad promised me.”
Good piece! Finally, someone who appreciates "Interstellar" on the same level I did! But for me, my favorite film of the year is still a close race between "Interstellar" and "Boyhood".
ReplyDeletespot on Ben. as you know i too called Interstellar my fav for 2014; like yourself, it is the one that 'moved' me most.
ReplyDeletebtw i even saw it for a THIRD time at OMSI's epic empirical screen. it's great. i actually think their screen is even better than most IMAX screens i've been to. highly recommend it (and they are also equipped for Atmos).
anyway. i loved it again the third time, however not as impactful the first and second time around (which is to be expected) and it allowed me to view it with a more 'technical lens', if you will. that said i can understand why it missed the big prizes at the recent oscars, and fairly so. the editing and screenplay could have been much better considering the scope and ambition of its source material. but does that make me love it less ? HELL NO ! i still love this movie and will for a long time. i'm not overly bothered by slight imperfections; and in many ways, often times, the truly beautiful are actually the sum of their imperfections.
kudos, monsieur Nolan.
Great to hear "Interstellar" get some love from all you guys! And I agree--the greatest films often have imperfections. Perhaps it's because greatness requires boldness and when you're being bold, taking creative risks, you inevitably make some missteps. Maybe that's why some flawed movies move us more than some "perfect" ones.
ReplyDeleteAgain, thanks for the great comments everyone!