THE
B. SINGER TEAM: A LOOK AT THE “FUTURE PAST” POSSE
by Bennett Campbell
Ferguson
Above: Hugh Jackman, Michael Fassbender, and James McAvoy in "Days of"
What if Christopher Nolan
returned for a fourth “Dark Knight”?
What if Sofia Coppola went back to Tokyo? What if Abdellatif Kechiche decided to direct
“La Vie D’Adele – Chapitre 3 Et 4”?
Imagine those speaker-shaking possibilities (one of which happens to be
much more than a mere possibility) and you’ll start to understand the immensity
of Bryan Singer’s decision to direct “X-Men: Days of Future Past,” which opens
on May 23RD.
On the
surface, the jobs seems routine; after all, why shouldn’t a director with three
comic book movies under his belt try his hand at a fourth? But the fact remains that the last film Mr.
Singer directed in the “X-Men” franchise was the 2003 apocalyptic masterpiece
“X2.” And because that movie was poetic,
tragic, and thrillingly emotional, it remains not only Mr. Singer’s magnum
opus, but one of the most bruising and exhilarating cinematic experiences in
recent memory.
It’s
also one that’s not an easy act to follow. But Mr. Singer has built his career on
surprising and brazenly intuitive choices, from probing his childhood
fascination with World War II in “Valkyrie” to turning “Superman Returns” into
a $250 million art film. And in the
following months, I’ll be revisiting his continuously astonishing films as we
march ever closer to the opening of “Days of Future Past.”
But
first, introductions are in order. Because
like so many auteurs, Mr. Singer doesn’t fulfill himself as a filmmaker on his
own—he works with a gifted creative team whose composing, editing, costuming,
and filming skills are equally recognizable.
So here is a quick dossier of some of Team Singer’s key players:
JOHN
OTTMAN At once romantic and discordant, John Ottman’s music has
played a crucial role in all of Mr. Singer’s films. It can be darkly brassy (the grimly majestic
fanfare of “X2” suggests “Star Wars” in D minor), but also unbearably
tender. Just listen to the sonic ballet
of piano and then choir that accompanies Superman’s melancholy flight from Lois
Lane’s riverside house in “Superman Returns”—the music is unbearably sad, yet
somehow hopeful in its sweetness.
Generating that kind of emotion has given Mr. Ottman a
strong authorship over Mr. Singer’s films.
Yet what really makes him unique is his added role as editor. Few directors love juggling huge ensembles
and gargantuan battles as much as Mr. Singer and Mr. Ottman is usually the one
tasked with pulling the pieces together.
And it’s no exaggeration to say that he does it perfectly—whether stitching
together an anguished montage in “X2” or sorting through a flurry of phone
calls in “Valkyrie,” he imbues every scene with a coherence that only enhances
each film’s exceptional humanity.
LOUISE
MINGENBACH One of the most intriguing things about Mr. Singer is that
even though he always aspires to emotional realism, his films often seem to
exist out of time, in a landscape or era of their own making. And as a costume designer, Ms. Mingenbach has
proved particularly important in constructing such worlds—in fact, her surreal
attention to the details of everything from sleek flight suits to ordinary
pajamas was what made “X-Men” and “X2” feel futuristic, but not otherworldly.
Still, Ms. Mingenbach’s greatest accomplishment might be
“Superman Returns.” While the film is
set in the Twenty-First Century (note the frequent use of cell phones in the picture),
the costumes make it look fascinatingly old fashioned—from Clark Kent’s
three-piece suits to the white coat worn by Lex Luthor, each outfit helps paint
a fascinating tableau of old and new.
Thus, Ms.
Mingenbach creates her own reality, though not in the knowingly absurd manner
of Wes Anderson—instead, she generates retro fashion that is markedly strange yet
utterly in tune with the film’s portrayal of Superman as a man out of
time.
NEWTON
THOMAS SIGEL It bears noting that in Hollywood, there’s no
such thing as a monogamous creative team (even Christopher Nolan’s
collaborators have strayed to work on films like “John Carter” and “Ender’s
Game”). But though Newton Thomas Sigel
has lent his prowess in cinematography to everything from “Leap Year” to
“Drive,” there can be no doubt that he’s done his finest work with Mr. Singer.
So what is the shot that truly sells me on Mr.
Sigel? Is it the close up of lamp lit
pen and paper in “Valkyrie”? Or perhaps
the vertical take of a gleaming elevator shaft in “The Usual Suspects”? Or possibly (quite possibly), the image of a
lone woman standing firm against a torrent of tidal waves in “X2”?
Suffice to say, picking a favorite is difficult. So I’ll just say this—because Mr. Singer
prefers pictures to words, he could not tell his stories without the powerfully
observant eyes of Mr. Sigel. Because at
the end of the day, the images of their movies are what you remember, and
they’re the result of one of the greatest cinematographer-director teams of our
time.
No comments:
Post a Comment