OH,
TO BE YOUNG AND HEAVILY ARMED:
“JACK
RYAN” IS PREQUEL PROPAGANDA by Bennett Campbell Ferguson
Left: Chris Pine as Jack Ryan
Early in “Jack Ryan: Shadow
Recruit,” the very evil banker Viktor Charevin (Kenneth Branagh) makes a solemn
declaration: “Mother Russia will be avenged.
America will bleed!” It’s a
hopeless promise, of course, because like all villains, Charevin is doomed to be
outwitted by a resourceful and handsome hero.
But before you fault the fellow’s prophetic prowess, consider that thanks
to “Jack Ryan”’s poor box office performance, the American movie business is at
least bleeding money.
I can’t
say I’m disappointed, especially since the film has enough of cringe-inducing
moments (a “cute” marriage proposal comes to mind) to make you wish you’d
decided to see “Inside Llewyn Davis” a second time instead. And yet despite that, “Jack Ryan” is not
without its pleasures. True, the movie
is rather stupid, but it’s hardly unentertaining—something which distressingly
few American blockbusters can boast of.
Still, that’s no thanks to the film’s first act. Following the example of Christopher Nolan’s
“Batman Begins,” “Jack Ryan” purports to develop an emotional back story for its
titular CIA analyst, beginning with young Jack (Chris Pine) getting wounded in
Afghanistan and being offered a chance to put his intellect to patriotic use as
a secret agent. Then, before long, he’s
undercover in New York, ferreting out terrorist financiers and attempting to
conceal his activities from his girlfriend Cathy (Keira Knightley).
I’ll
grant you—as heroic histories go, this is fairly workable, if not nearly as
memorable as Bruce Wayne’s boyhood tumble into the Batcave. Yet there’s something disturbingly jingoistic
about this new version of Ryan. No
longer is he just a good man doing his job (as he was in John McTiernan’s
marvelous 1990 thriller “The Hunt for Red October”)—instead, he’s become a
poster child for enlistment and unquestioning patriotism. Oh sure, Jack is horrified the first time
he’s forced to kill a man on the job, but any regret is hurriedly washed away by
the triumphant Patrick Doyle music that’s played when a CIA handler presses a
gun into our hero’s hand.
In such moments, “Jack Ryan” threatens to veer out of the
realm of pleasing fantasy and into the very real minefield of propaganda. And yet Mr. Branagh (who also directed the
film) wisely drops that subtext and focuses instead on a thrillingly intricate series
of events in Moscow, where Ryan attempts to derail Charevin’s dastardly scheme
(which involves crippling the American economy via terrorism). Thus, we get the expected fistfights and car
chases, but also a giddily bizarre sequence in which Jack pretends to drunk,
hoping to trick Charevin into underestimating him—a twist that makes the film
genuinely suspenseful and gives Mr. Pine a chance to display the biting vigor
he’s brought to the “Star Trek” movies.
But should you
stay in your seat after that? Probably
not. Because even though the final act
of “Jack Ryan” has enough adrenaline to keep your eyes glued to the screen (especially
when Jack struggles to steer a bomb-toting van into the East River), the film
simply isn’t arresting enough to make it more worthwhile than the numerous
action movies that are available on DVD.
And
more to the point, the hard truth is that as competently assembled as “Jack
Ryan” is (Mr. Branagh, who also directed “Thor,” knows from blockbusters), it
fails to answer a key question: why does Jack Ryan fight? To save America? To save his loved ones? Whatever the reason, it never registers strongly
enough for us to truly want him to succeed.
No comments:
Post a Comment