And so it begins again. Whenever a new year starts, I always have one
question—what will the next twelve months of movies be like? Happier or sadder? Better or worse? The same is always? It’s always exciting when these questions are
a complete mystery, just as it’s thrilling to go to the movies for the first
time in the new year to see the answers beginning to unfold.
So far, I for one am
satisfied. “Safe Haven,” the first 2013
film I’ve seen, is a workable romantic melodrama, one that seems catch itself
every time it slips off the rails. That
has a great deal to do with Julianne Hough, the movie’s attractive star, but
also with the intelligent craftsmanship of director Lasse Hallström and editor
Andrew Mondshein. Together, they have
made a formulaic melodrama that almost feels like a passion project.
From the first scene, tension
seems to shred the screen. Katie (Ms.
Hough) is on the run from her abusive husband Tierney (a menacing David
Lyons). We see her racing through the
rain to catch a bus, a hood pulled over her head in a frightened attempt at a
disguise. She escapes, but her fear
never fully evaporates. Sudden noises
(whether from cars or coffee makers) make her jump like a hunted creature; and
she’s haunted by dark memories of Tierney’s violence.
In this narrative equation,
there is of course a utopian alternative to the dystopian vision of Tierney and
his world of suburban crime (he happens to be a cop, unfortunately). Katie finds a new home in a small, portside
southern town, where she’s gradually won over by a widower named Alex (Josh
Duhamel). She resists his advances,
gamely, but this is an adaptation of a Nicholas Sparks novel (he wrote “The
Notebook,” “The Last Song,” and “The Lucky One”) so making love really is the
only option.
This kind of formula is not
bothersome—why watch any movie if not to experience romance? What is slightly problematic is that the
characters are vague archetypes at best.
It makes sense that Katie never reveals much about her past life, but
what of her interests, hopes, dreams, and aspirations? Surely there’s more to her than just wanting
to escape one man and find another.
Similarly, it would make the movie more enjoyable if Alex was defined by
something more than his grief, his courtship skills, and his attempts to father
his kids.
These are gaping holes and
with a stronger script (the movie was written by Leslise Bohern and Dana
Stevens), I think Ms. Hough and Mr. Duhamel could have filled in the
pieces. But Mr. Hallström and Mr.
Mondshein work hard at that job. What
sustains your interest in “Safe Haven” is the way the alternate scenes of
Katie’s beatific seaside existence with moments Tierney’s fevered search for
his wife. Snapping at subordinates and
interrogating neighbors, he’s a credibly frightening villain, especially in the
moments where he manages to keep his emotions in check (watch his convincing performance
at a bus ticket window). This element of
danger keeps the movie from devolving into a romantic scenic tour, just as the
romance alleviates the nervous, abusive tension when necessary.
This kind of narrative balance
makes “Safe Haven” an enjoyable comeback for Mr. Hallström. Last year, he released “Salmon Fishing in the
Yemen,” a painfully syrupy comedy packed with pretentiousness. Most obnoxiously, it pretended to have some
sort of political conscience. “Safe
Haven,” by contrast, sticks to the characters and allows some secrets to stay
buried Ms. Hough’s serious, controlled persona.
You’re never more with her then when she’s alone and vulnerable at the
beginning, but the movie the movie never loses you, even when it seems to be
fading.
No comments:
Post a Comment