Tuesday, November 25, 2014

Movie Review: "Nightcrawler" (Dan Gilroy, 2014)

HE SEES DEAD PEOPLE by Bennett Campbell Ferguson
Above: Jake Gyllenhaal as the titular nightcrawler
 
It’s night in Los Angeles.  A small, greasy-haired man is trying to tear some metal off a chain link fence…when a security guard steps out of the darkness, demanding to see some identification.  “I think I’m lost,” the man explains.  Then, he hits the guard and leaves him lying there, unconscious on the ground.

            So begins “Nightcrawler,” a clear-eyed, oily-hearted look into the life of the hitter in question, Lou Bloom (Jake Gyllenhaal).  When we first meet him, he’s a thief who gets by selling stolen manhole covers and metal scraps.  But when Lou sees a TV camera crew filming a car accident, his fate is assured.  Starved for work and money, he buys a camera and starts patrolling the city, gathering footage of accidents and crimes that he can sell to the highest bidder.

            Not a pleasant story.  “Nightcrawler” is the directorial debut of writer Dan Gilroy (“The Bourne Legacy”) and while his visuals are as clean and sleek as a televised weather report, the core of his movie is twisted and queasy.  There’s no one to root for; Mr. Gilroy may spin Lou as an outsider in the world of “nightcrawlers” (Lou’s macho, hackneyed rival is played by Bill Paxton), but that narrative strategy invites only a modicum of sympathy for Mr. Gyllenhaal’s leering pipsqueak.  Lou, with his creepily eager eyes and high-pitched speeches about business and success, seems not just morally bankrupt, but genuinely evil.

            If you don’t believe me, wait until you see what happens when Lou becomes not only a voyeur, but a murderer.  By then, it becomes apparent that there are no shades of gray to this guy, and that’s the film’s biggest problem.  “Nightcrawler” may purport to be an exposé of contemporary media, but it refuses probe Lou’s psyche, even as it clings to his story like a hungry mosquito.  The result?  A movie that, with its obsessive focus on Lou’s disturbing behavior, embodies the very spirit of the shallow, exploitive television reports it attempts to critique.  

            That doesn’t mean that “Nightcrawler” is a waste of time—far from it.  Because while Mr. Gilroy’s critique of television reporting is flimsy at best, his commentary on the twenty-first century American psyche has genuine bite.  Just watch the early scene when Lou reflects on his education, saying that school taught him to expect “his needs to be considered.”  Fair enough, except he then explains that he now knows that self-esteem is irrelevant—that he needs to make money and he’s willing to do whatever it takes.

            That moment resonated with me more than anything else in the film.  School protects you from the world as much as it prepares you for it, and the most compellingly freakish idea in “Nightcrawler” is that Lou ultimately takes another route—he learns to interact with station managers and newscasters though online business courses that allow him to sound like he knows what he’s talking about.  The terrifying result?  That by the end, he’s become a mini-entrepreneur.  “I will never ask you to do anything I wouldn’t do myself,” he proudly tells his new employees near the film’s end.

            Yikes.

No comments:

Post a Comment